Knowledge translation for nursing care for patients with Risk of perioperative positioning injury: A case report.

PURPOSE: The aim was to apply the Advanced Nursing Process and demonstrating procedures of surgical positioning, as well as to show the participating the Nursing Outcomes Classification findings in order to translate the knowledge on specific preventive perioperative positioning into practice, the review of clinical protocols and nursing care plan. METHODS: The methods used include case report about knowledge translation by applying training modalities, review and adaptation of clinical protocols and examination of nursing care plans. FINDINGS: One hundred and nine healthcare providers attended the training, including nurses and nursing technicians working in the surgical center and the outpatient surgical center of the hospital chosen for this study. The surgical positioning protocols were revised based on the evidence described in the literature and the main surgical guidelines. The review of care registered in the institution's electronic system for the nursing prescription stage of the diagnosis Risk of perioperative positioning injury was based on the review on evidence on risk factors, the main guidelines in the area and the interventions suggested by Nursing Intervention Classification. The electronic system had registered 14 cares for this diagnosis, and after the review, one care was excluded and eight new cares were included, totaling 21 cares. CONCLUSION: Nursing teams play a prominent role in positioning patients for surgery, protecting them in a moment of extreme vulnerability, thus making knowledge about the fundamental elements of surgical positioning essential. This emphasizes the importance of training, and of reviewing protocols and records of procedures that promote safety to patients and care teams. IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The translation of knowledge about the Advanced Nursing Process in the perioperative area contributes to the refinement of classifications and standardization of language in this scenario, subsidizing an evidence-based clinical practice.

OBJETIVO: O objetivo foi aplicar o Processo de Enfermagem Avançado e demonstrar procedimentos de posicionamento cirúrgico, bem como mostrar aos participantes os achados da Nursing Outcomes Classification para traduzir na prática o conhecimento específico sobre prevenção no posicionamento perioperatóriontivo, bem como a revisão de protocolos clínicos e do plano de cuidados de enfermagem. MÉTODOS: Relato de caso sobre tradução do conhecimento por meio da aplicação de modalidades de treinamento, revisão e adaptação de protocolos clínicos e análise de planos de cuidados de enfermagem. RESULTADOS: 109 profissionais de enfermagem participaram do treinamento, incluindo enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem que atuam no centro cirúrgico e no centro cirúrgico ambulatorial do hospital escolhido para este estudo. Os protocolos de posicionamento cirúrgico foram revisados com base nas evidências descritas na literatura e nas principais diretrizes cirúrgicas. A revisão dos cuidados registrados no sistema eletrônico da instituição para a etapa de prescrição de enfermagem do diagnóstico Risco de lesão por posicionamento perioperatório foi baseada na revisão das evidências sobre os fatores de risco, as principais diretrizes da área e as intervenções sugeridas pela Nursing Intervention Classification. O sistema eletrônico tinha 14 cuidados cadastrados para este diagnóstico, e após a revisão, um cuidado foi excluído e oito novos cuidados foram incluídos, totalizando 21 cuidados. CONCLUSÃO: A equipe de enfermagem tem papel de destaque no posicionamento do paciente para a cirurgia, protegendo-o em um momento de extrema vulnerabilidade, tornando imprescindível o conhecimento sobre os elementos fundamentais do posicionamento cirúrgico. Ressalta-se a importância do treinamento e da revisão de protocolos e registros de procedimentos que promovem a segurança do paciente e da equipe assistencial. IMPLICAÇÃO PARA A PRÁTICA DE ENFERMAGEM: A tradução do conhecimento sobre o Processo de Enfermagem Avançado na área perioperatória contribui para o refinamento das classificações e padronização da linguagem neste cenário, subsidiando uma prática clínica baseada em evidências.

Patterns, appropriateness and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter use in Brazil: a multicentre study of 12 725 catheters.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) use, appropriateness and device outcomes in Brazil. METHODS: We conducted an observational, prospective, cohort study spanning 16 Brazilian hospitals from October 2018 to August 2020. Patients ≥18 years receiving a PICC were included. PICC placement variables were abstracted from medical records. PICC-related major (deep vein thrombosis (DVT), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter occlusion) and minor complications were collected. Appropriateness was evaluated using the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC). Devices were considered inappropriate if they were in place for <5 days, were multi-lumen, and/or were placed in patients with a creatinine >2.0 mg/dL. PICCs considered appropriate met none of these criteria. Mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level characteristics assessed the association between appropriateness and major complications. RESULTS: Data from 12 725 PICCs were included. Mean patient age was 66.4±19 years and 51.0% were female. The most common indications for PICCs were intravenous antibiotics (81.1%) and difficult access (62.7%). Most PICCs (72.2%) were placed under ultrasound guidance. The prevalence of complications was low: CLABSI (0.9%); catheter-related DVT (1.0%) and reversible occlusion (2.5%). Of the 12 725 devices included, a total of 7935 (62.3%) PICCs were inappropriate according to MAGIC. With respect to individual metrics for appropriateness, 17.0% were placed for <5 days, 60.8% were multi-lumen and 11.3% were in patients with creatinine >2.0 mg/dL. After adjusting for patient and hospital-level characteristics, multi-lumen PICCs considered inappropriate were associated with greater odds of major complications (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.61 to 4.02). CONCLUSIONS: Use of PICCs in Brazilian hospitals appears to be safe and comparable with North America. However, opportunities to improve appropriateness remain. Future studies examining barriers and facilitators to improving device use in Brazil would be welcomed.

Cross-cultural applicability of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale in a multi-national study.

AIM: The Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES) was newly developed as a self-report measure for self-care self-efficacy for chronic illness. This study investigated its measurement equivalence (ME) in different cultural groups, including United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil. DESIGN: A multi-national study for cross-cultural validation of the Scale. METHODS: From January 2015 - December 2018, investigators recruited 957 patients (United State: 200; Hong Kong: 300; Italy: 285; and Brazil: 142) with chronic illness from inpatient and outpatient settings. The SCSES was administered and clinical and demographic data were collected from participants. Based on the Meredith framework, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis evaluated the configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance of the scale across the four populations through a series of nested models, with evaluation of reliability and coherence of the factor solution. RESULTS: The mean ages of the groups ranged from 65-77 years, 56.4% was male. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the single-factor SCSES were 0.93, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.90 for the United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil, respectively. Three of the four levels of ME were partially or totally supported. The highest level achieved was partial scalar invariance level (χ2 [52] = 313.4, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.067; 95% CI = 0.056-0.077; CFI = 0.966; TLI = 0.960, SRMR = 0.080). CONCLUSION: Patients from the four countries shared the same philosophical orientation towards scale items, although some of the items contributed differently to represent the concept and participants shared the same schemata for score interpretation. IMPACT: Self-efficacy is important in producing effective and sustainable self-care behavioural changes. Cultural ideation shapes the ways individuals interpret and report their self-care self-efficacy. The study findings support cross-cultural and cross-national utility of the SCSES for research on self-care across United States, China (Hong Kong), Italy, and Brazil.